Ordinary least squares for a continuous outcome: the workhorse family. Use these when your response is a measured quantity (a score, a time, a concentration) and your predictors are any mix of continuous variables, binary groups, and factors.
Note
These pages are a recognition index — organised by the shape of the analysis, not by which MCPower feature they show off. If your outcome is binary, you want GLM; if your data is grouped or repeated-measures, see mixed models.
Examples
- Simple linear regression: one continuous predictor
wage ~ years_education— one continuous predictor's effect on a continuous outcome, nothing held constant. - Two-predictor multiple regression
plant_biomass ~ rainfall + soil_nitrogen— two continuous predictors, each adjusted for the other. - Three continuous predictors, side by side
cholesterol ~ age + bmi + exercise_hours— three additive continuous slopes, mutually adjusted. - Continuous-by-continuous moderation
well_being ~ income * social_support— does income's slope change across levels of social support? - Three-way continuous interaction
growth_rate ~ temperature * moisture * soil_ph— a full three-way interaction among continuous predictors. - Interaction-only term (no moderator main effect)
yield ~ nitrogen + nitrogen:water— water bends the nitrogen slope but has no main effect of its own. - Two groups as regression (independent t-test)
pain_score ~ treatment— compare two group means as a single-binary-predictor regression. - ANCOVA: group effect adjusting for a baseline
blood_pressure ~ treatment + baseline_bp— group effect net of a continuous baseline (parallel slopes). - ANCOVA homogeneity-of-slopes test
blood_pressure ~ treatment * baseline_bp— does the treatment effect depend on the baseline covariate? - Adjusted two-group comparison (parallel slopes)
monthly_income ~ union_member + experience_years— a binary group gap holding a continuous control fixed. - Binary-by-continuous moderation
wage ~ gender * experience_years— does the experience slope differ between two groups? - Three-level categorical predictor
abundance ~ habitat— a single 3-level factor, read as its two dummy contrasts vs the reference. - One focal predictor adjusted for covariates
hourly_wage ~ years_education + age + experience_years + tenure— one focal predictor net of correlated controls. - Factor interacting with a continuous predictor
biomass ~ habitat * rainfall— does the rainfall slope differ across the levels of a factor? - Two interacting categorical predictors (2x2 factorial)
job_satisfaction ~ gender * sector— two two-level factors and their interaction (factorial as regression). - Continuous moderation with a covariate
recovery_days ~ dose * age + baseline_severity— a continuous interaction adjusted for an additive covariate. - Ordinal predictor as a linear trend
tumor_shrinkage ~ dose_level— an ordered dose (0–3) read as one slope.